123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657
// Note://   This compares pbkit with protobuf.js for the all necessary steps for codegen.//   It's may not fair comparison because the two are different, but both commonly involve reading files, parsing, and transform into the internal representation.////   This inclues IO intensive part
const path = require('path');const { Benchmark } = require('benchmark');
const { build } = require('pbkit/core/schema/builder');const createLoader = require('pbkit/node/createLoader').default;
const protobufjs = require('protobufjs');
const protoPath = path.resolve(__dirname, '../data');
function createPbkitLoader() {  const roots = [protoPath];  const loader = createLoader({ roots });  return {    load: filePath => build({ loader, files: [filePath] }),  };}const pbkitLoader = createPbkitLoader();
const noop = () => {};const pbkitTest = () => pbkitLoader.load('simple.proto');const protobufjsTest = () => protobufjs.load(path.join(protoPath, 'simple.proto'));
async function run() {  console.log('pbkit result:', await pbkitTest());  console.log('protobufjs result:', await protobufjsTest());
  return new Benchmark.Suite()  .add('noop', noop)  .add('pbkit load schema', {    defer: true,    fn: async deferred => {      await pbkitTest();      deferred.resolve();    },  })  .add('protobufjs load descriptor', {    defer: true,    fn: async deferred => {      await protobufjsTest();      deferred.resolve();    },  })  .on('cycle', event => {    console.log(event.target.toString());  })  .run({ async: true });}
run();